The three million hectares of fertile land that Fedegán is going to sell to the Government will be an opportunity to find out what is true in that a high percentage of these lands have been usurped and obtained at a price of fear by the famous "third parties in good faith" since the 1990s. Or will it be that Fedegán will choose the available lands with tweezers, so that they do not end up having legitimacy problems in their titling?That will come to be known.In any case, they are very large extensions to intuit that they are immaculate.Unless, obviously, the transaction involves a kind of gentlemen's agreement between a government of compassionate capitalism?and some landowners urgent for liquidity.I limit myself to questioning and questioning it, since such an operation would require greater filigree and political sophistication.And everything is coming out very “mamey”.I would like, for example, that the agreed sum be below the commercial average price and that this hypothetical reduction serve as compensation —guaranteed by the State— for the restitution claimants and, at the same time, grant some degree of immunity to the ranchers. involved in the dispossession.There is still time, if there are poisoned lands, for them to cost nothing, without prejudice to the fact that if their possession involved crimes, other instances —such as the JEP or the JEP itself— deal with the matter.Luckily there is a rigorous registry in the National Land Agency and in the Prosecutor's Office, both of those and of these, and it would be convenient not to exempt the sellers from the truth component... although the simple elimination of the cost would be equivalent to a confession.The important thing is that the melancholy image that peace was bought does not remain in historical memory.It is advisable, even if the price of healthy land is commercially correct, not to avoid the sincerity factor and for sellers to offer guarantees of non-recidivism against the new residents of the estates.Personally, it makes me nervous to hear Mr. Lafaurie talk about 70% of cattle hectares under his leadership and not even blush.The State is the guarantor and cannot allow itself to be naive.Otherwise, it would be a grotesque replica of the National Front.We must not forget that Minister Cecilia López, although she seems to act in good faith, was nurtured in the doctrine of exclusive bipartisanship.And that the good Danilo Rueda is a believer in the conversion of souls.